Papers published in present Proceedings show that the majority of territorial names in Central Europe originate in Slavic language roots. This indicates the aborigine status of Slavic speaking populations in this region. Typically, territorial characteristics were named by aborigines since they were very important for them. Especially names of rivers and mountains were useful way-marks on their commercial travelling. Naming originated at the latest in the time when they were advancing towards North during warming after the last glacial period, and the latest during their retraction towards South after strong cooling in the 2^nd millennium BC.
      Papers on pre-antique inscriptions understandable using Slavic language bases indicate their incorrect understanding by West European linguists, who see in these ancient inscriptions first of all some supposed names. As a criterion they use Latin endings that do not give suitable results and do not correspond in frequency analysis with Latin as the reference language. Characteristic for their deciphering is the absence of analysis of characteristics of these inscriptions, for example the frequency of sounds, roots and word endings in those ancient dialects.
      Papers on Venetic, Rhaetic, Phrygian and Thracian inscriptions use the approach based on root bases, and they also consider statistical evaluation of language phenomena. As a basic characteristic they consider dialectal tongues that are not as uniformed as the present literary languages. Till now this fact wasn't taken into account by West European linguists. Dividing of continuous inscriptions is based in present papers on roots and only suitable division of those texts makes possible the analysis of dialects. Only after these steps it is possible to determine dialectal endings as a base for grammatical details.